000			02156nam a22002177a 4500
005			20250711112243.0
008			250711b ph ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022			_a2704-2812
040			_cOCT
100			_aBuccat, Monica
240			_aJournal of Philippine Tourism and Hospitality / _hDecember 2020
245			_aFrom recovery marketing to destination resilience : _bA comparative case analysis of tourism disaster recovery strategies in Asia / _cMonica Buccat
300			_aVol 2 (1) pages 1-18 : _billustrations ; _c25 cm
500			_aTourism disaster management literature is replete with models of both short and long-term strategies for destination recovery after disasters. Firm-level analysis dominated earlier work, which emphasized the effective collaboration of industry stakeholders with the government's emergency management units. With the rising incidence and severity of natural disasters attributed to climate change, context-specific models that treat tourism as socio-ecological systems provide a better understanding of how tourist destinations recover and build resilience to the onslaught of extreme weather conditions. The qualitative study draws insights from several case studies: Bohol after the 7.2 magnitude earthquake and Typhoon Haiyan in 2013, Bali Indonesia after the Bali bombings in 2002 and 2005, Andaman Coast in Thailand, and Arugam Bay in Sri Lanka after the 2004 tsunami. The study developed a framework of analysis using resilience research models and adapted it to tourism settings to draw lessons from actual tourism recovery stages. The study found that while the tourism industry of a destination recovers, part of the system remains vulnerable to disasters. To build resilience, destinations need to strengthen their adaptive capacities in economic development, social capital, and information and communications. The study sought to contribute to the limited research on resilience building in tourist destinations.
650			_aTourism disaster management
650			_atourism recovery
650			_aresilience
650			_aadaptive capacity
650			_aclimate change
942			_2ddc _cCR _n0
999			_c10391 _d10391