| 000 | 01184nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20230717151249.0 | ||
| 008 | 230717b ph ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | _cOCT | ||
| 240 |
_aThe Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology / _hSpring 2022 |
||
| 245 |
_aReconceiving coercion-based criminal defences / _cStephen R. Galoob & Erin Sheley |
||
| 260 |
_aHanover, PA : _bNorthwestern University : _c2022 |
||
| 300 | _aVol 112 (2) : pages 265-328 | ||
| 505 | _aCoercing someone is sometimes wrong and sometimes a crime. People subject to coercion are sometimes eligible for criminal defenses, such as duress. How, exactly, does coercion operate in such contexts? Among legal scholars, the predominant understanding of coercion is the "wrongful pressure"model, which states that coercion exists when the coercer wrongfully threatens the target and, as a result of this threat, the target is pressured to act in accordance with the coercer's threat. This article articulates and defends an alternative understanding of coercion that, after Scott Anderson's theory of the same name we call he "enforcement approach" to coercion. | ||
| 653 | _aCoercion | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cCR _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c8854 _d8854 |
||