| 000 | 01466nam a22001817a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20241028142121.0 | ||
| 008 | 241028b ph ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0021-8448 | ||
| 040 | _cOCT | ||
| 100 | _aGroskopf, Thomas | ||
| 240 |
_aJournal of Accountancy / _hJuly 2024 |
||
| 245 |
_aAudit smarter by reassessing audit risk / _cThomas Groskopf |
||
| 260 |
_aDurham, NC : _bAICPA & CIMA , _c2024 - |
||
| 300 |
_aVol 238 (2) Pages 40-43 : _billustrations ; _c28 cm |
||
| 500 | _aMisstatement, as a back-end, form-driven compliance exercise. In these settings, risk assessment can be perceived as inefficient and not adding value. A 2022 survey of CPEA members conducted by the AICPA Auditing Standards Board (ASB) found that 75% of respondents believed the costs of an audit exceed the benefits for less complex entities (LCEs). Further, 73% of respondents reported that they are reluctant to scale or modify requirements in GAAS when auditing an LCE, primarily because of concerns related to peer review. Concurrently, risk assessment compliance and audit quality concerns exist, including those noted by practitioners performing peer reviews and by the AICPA Enhancing Audit Quality initiative. Standards are becoming increasingly complicated, in part reflecting the complexity of the business envi-ronment. Finally, the profession faces a workforce shortage that some have suggested is at a crisis level. | ||
| 650 | _aAudit & Assurance | ||
| 942 |
_2ddc _cCR _n0 |
||
| 999 |
_c9922 _d9922 |
||